Floodplain Woody Vegetation Evapotranspiration project

This project aimed to improve the understanding of water and salt movement in lower River Murray floodplains from River Red Gum and Black Box tree ET. This presentation provides an opportunity for salinity managers, environmental water managers, and river managers to be presented with the outcomes emerging from this research project.

Background

In May 2019, under the CSIRO-MDBA (Murray-Darling Basin Authority) Partnership Agreement, a project to quantify total water losses or evapotranspiration (ET) from key floodplain vegetation located over saline groundwater within the Murray-Darling Basin (MDB) began. Lack of woody vegetation ET data has been identified as a significant knowledge gap in the ability to understand and model salt mobilisation in the lower Murray. Numerical models inform management decisions by simulating the movement of water and salt within the floodplain and river channel environment. The aim of this study, therefore, was to provide robust field data of woody vegetation ET, to improve river and saline floodplain management as well as improve the accuracy of ET data used in numerical models. The field data has been used to further develop a model to predict quantified spatial monthly timeseries ET outputs from 2000 onwards, for floodplain trees across the MDB.

Implications of management watering actions field locations have intentionally been selected in areas where there are predicted management actions in the future. This includes salt interception scheme manipulation to vary scheme operation, as well monitoring the influence of environmental flow actions on floodplain vegetation ET and hence response of trees to altered water availability, highlighting tree water stress changes. Sites likely to be responding to environmental flow allocations include the Bookpurnong Red Gum and Black Box, Calperum Red Gum site, Calperum Site 1 and the Lindsay flushed zone site which are likely to have benefited from the 2020 River Murray ‘southern spring flow’. The Lindsay wet site also received water in the adjacent creek in spring/summer 2020 and 2021 related to the southern spring flow. All sites were inundated with the natural River Murray flood event in the summer of 2022-23.

After four years (2019-2024) of monitoring and model refinements, we can present robust data and modelling results of tree ET during managed and natural river flow events. New insights into information about groundwater extraction from tree ET processes on the floodplain will also be shared. Further information is also available in the journal article below and is freely available to access:

Doody TM, Gao S, Vervoort W, Pritchard JL, Davies MJ, Nolan M, Nagler P. 2023. A river basin scale spatial model to advance understanding of riverine tree response to hydrological management. Journal of Environmental Management, 332, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117393

Data and Resources

Additional Info

Field Value
Domain Salinity
Data / Information Category Presentation
Authoring Agency Murray-Darling Basin Authority
Authors
Additional Notes
Source
Version
Language
Landing page
Update date
Jurisdiction
Temporal coverage from
Temporal coverage to
Geospatial coverage